| |
 |
Neuron News Topic :: Neurotech Research
with 6 published articles |
 |
|
|
June 07, 2009
:::
Illuminating Your Thoughts
|
Sticking sharp, pointy metal needles into your brain is never an idea for a good time (image, deep brain stimulation). Future successful developments in neurotechnology, however, will be dependent on discovering ways to directly access our neurons without damaging surrounding brain tissue.
The mechanisms of how neural stimulation affects a human is still largely misunderstood, but therapeutic deep brain stimulation is used to relieve symptoms in patients with Parkinson's Disease, dystonia (a disorder involving continuous muscle contraction), and even severe cases of depression. This technique is still highly experimental and carries risks from the invasive nature of implanting electrodes into your brain.
Although still invasive, a new approach is being developed at Case Western Reserve University by the Strowbridge Lab, where a specially coated glass needle containing tons of metallic nanoparticles is inserted into the brain. Typically, electrical wires are needed to connect to implanted stimulating devices, but these nanoparticles are designed to generate electric fields when illuminated by infrared laser light (at 830 nm wavelength). No wires needed, just a non-invasive laser zap. The infrared wavelength is a useful selection because it easily passes through brain tissue, but can then be absorbed by the nanoparticles and re-radiated as an electric field.
Another key advantage to this technique is that the tiny electric fields from the particles will superimpose and extend out into the surrounding tissue stimulating the neurons in the field's wake to either generate their own electrical signals or possibly suppress their activity. The range of this wireless approach allows for a broader swath of neurons to be affected, whereas direct electrode stimulation can only influence a small cluster of nearby cells.
Indirectly activating neurons with laser light has been performed on cells in culture (read more), but this is the first attempt at working in actual brain tissue. So far, these experiments are applied only to extracted tissue from rat brains, but it is an important first step toward developing the technology further to learn how to best apply it into a living brain.
"Laser Probes for Brain Experiments" :: IEEE Spectrum :: May 19, 2009 :: [ READ ]
:::
Written by Matthew T. Dearing | Article Link | What do you think? (3)
|
|
May 15, 2009
:::
Growing neurons on the Nanowire Superhighway
|
Many research groups have been working on the challenging aspects of controlling the growth of living neural networks. Of course, the ultimate hope is to eventually develop the technology to design electrical devices that will directly integrate with the human nervous system. A variety of important approaches are being considered, including surface patterning techniques used in conventional microfluidic technology ( learn more ), optical guidance from focused laser beams called "optical tweezers"--other wise known as present-day tractor beams--( learn more ), as well as various chemical coating methods like the use of novel "self-assembled monolayers" (SAMs). Here, a specialized two-ended molecule coats a surface with one end that likes to "stick" to the surface, like a silicon chip, and the other end likes to "stick" to neurons. Where ever the SAMs stick so will a neuron.
Recently at the Division of Solid State Physics at Lund University in Sweden, an advanced approach to surface patterning has been developed using electron-beam lithography to create rows of nanowires sitting on the surface of a substrate that influences the directional growth of the neuron's axons and bundles of nerve fibers. You might imagine future neurotech device developers using this idea to pattern a silicon wafer with a specific highway map to force the exact growth of neurons in order to generate the correct network structure for a desired neuro-device's function.
All of this pioneering work in patterning the growth of neurons into a structured network has a long road ahead. These early developments are so critical, and progress along several, competing paths are important for developing effective methods to design and create real neurotechnolgocial devices.
And, to emphasize the importance of this research, we are beginning to develop a new Neuron News Review section to cover the past, present, and future directions in living neuron network pattern techniques.
"Nanotechnology helps building a highway for nerve fibers" :: Nanowerk Spotlight :: May 13, 2009 :: [ READ ]
:::
Written by Matthew T. Dearing | Article Link | What do you think? (2)
|
|
May 12, 2009
:::
Silicon Brains: Less gushy and maybe just as powerful
|
Recently we reviewed the interesting work of FACETS, a large European collaboration developing hardware-level designs for computer circuits that mimic the architecture of our brain. Another group here in the United States at Stanford University is taking an alternate hard-wiring approach to designing a brain in silico.
They hope to create a computer that works nearly as powerfully as the human brain--and be "affordable" at the same time. In addition, they also anticipate that not only will their work take a step forward to a deeper understanding of human brain function, but it will also provide the computational power to help other neuroscientists better analyze and simulate neural activity to advance their own research.
The research team, lead by Kwabena Boahen, is developing a neuromorphic chip: a computer that is not based on the classic transistor developed in 1947, but instead is composed of individual mini-circuits designed like a human neuron, developed some 250,000 or more years ago. More specifically, the ion-flow regulated in the neuron's membrane is replicated by electron flow in the silicon device. And with quite a bit of clever foresight, the interconnections between the "silicon neurons" are not permanently hardwired on the circuit. Instead, each silicon neuron is identified by a memory address, like in a typical RAM chip, and their electrical activity is referenced by the controlling software. This allows for the same chip to be soft-wired to model the interconnectivity of any sort of neural network that is desired to be used for a particular computational application.
Read more about the specific details of how the neuromorphic chips are designed, fabricated, and tested at the Brains in Silicon group's website. [ VISIT ]
Recommended article:
K Boahen, "Neuromorphic Microchips," Scientific American, vol 292, no 5, pp 56-63, May 2005. [ READ (pdf) ]
:::
Written by Matthew T. Dearing | Article Link | What do you think? (4)
|
|
May 11, 2009
:::
DARPA's Path the The Singularity
|
On May 5, 2009 DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) announced that it is preparing to begin an exciting new research program that may be the most ambitious and direct effort by the United States Government to to push human technology closer to the edge of the awaiting Singularity. The program is referred to as Physical Intelligence, and DARPA is currently soliciting interested research groups to develop project proposals for submission. The ultimate goal of the effort will be to fundamentally understand the physical phenomenon of intelligence and to then demonstrate the characteristic in a man-made electronic or chemical system.
Although you might have considered taking on this problem yourself this weekend, it's understandable if a week's worth of yard work and Mother's Day preparations took a critical priority. Leaving this project to large governmental agencies and massive academic and industrial collaborations may be the best idea for your personal work-load at this time.
The funding levels for the Physical Intelligence program have not yet been set, as they will be later determined depending on the details of winning proposals. This could be an effective blank check from the Federal Government supporting a potentially mammoth project that would do nothing less than transform humanity. Why go back to th Moon when we could instead solve one of the most fundamental questions of our species. In the meantime, America could certainly regain our stature of being the primary scientific center on Planet Earth.
What is particularly interesting about this solicitation is that DARPA has explicitly limited the theoretical framework from which researchers may pursue the solution to understanding Physical Intelligence. They make the bold claim that the phenomenon of intelligence emerges directly from thermodynamic processes in the human brain or an engineered machine. Any proposal that contains alternate viewpoints will automatically be rejected from consideration for funding.
At first, it may seem that starting with thermodynamics is too limiting for theoretical progress in modeling intelligent behavior. As a basic starting point, the science of thermodynamics looks at characteristics that emerge from a system composed of effectively infinite parts. For example, the measured temperature of your steak flaming on the grill is just the collective measurement of the motion of trillions of meat atoms and molecules. At other levels, the theory models the transfer of energy between systems and measures the slightly odd variable of entropy, which essentially characterizes how messed up the observed system is. In other words, the shattered glass just knocked to the floor by your coordination-lacking infant son has a higher entropy than it did moments before while sitting peacefully on the dinning room table.
But, we aren't just talking about heat engines that convert a hot flame into mechanical motion and the phase transition we experience every day while boiling water into steam over a hot stove. Thermodynamics and the broader field of statical mechanics represent the fundamental physics that underlie all of the relatively new ideas of self-organization, complex systems, network architecture and many other concepts that are driving the latest in brain science. Maybe DARPA really is on to something theoretical and, even if they don't know the answers to life's biggest questions just yet, they certainly know how to keep their funding solicitations general enough to allow for a broad range of scientific collaborators to jump on board ... if they are only brave enough.
The Physical Intelligence program is organized around three levels of critical milestones. The first step is to develop a mathematical theory of the thermodynamics of intelligence and then to represent this theory in a producible system. Second, the aforementioned engineered system must be built and successfully demonstrate intelligence. Third, and finally, additional tools must be developed and designed to further analyze and monitor the created intelligent systems.
The other key limitation to this solicitation is that proposers must be able to submit plans that cover not just a portion of these three milestones, but they must be prepared to take the project all the way to home plate. This is Nobel Prize territory, folks, and anyone who is prepared to tackle human species-altering projects must be ready for the ride of a lifetime.
The boldness of the program is nothing less than what would be expected from proud United States scientists, and the American society is certainly ready for another "One small step for man... one giant leap for mankind." It certainly is an exciting moment to see the interest, dedication, and--of course, most importantly--financial backing of the Federal Government be honed onto the advancement of machines that match, or even exceed, the level of human intelligence that we effortlessly demonstrate every day.
:::
Written by Matthew T. Dearing | Article Link | What do you think? (5)
|
|
November 19, 2008
:::
Explore the new Neuroscience Information Framework Database Online
|
Developing from an attempt of the NIH to help interconnect the information transfer between the multitude of government agencies supporting neuroscience research, a new online database collaboration began in 2005. The result is currently in the form of the new Neuroscience Information Framework as a publicly-accessible database of neuroscience-related information that is searchable from its online interface.
The database is not intended at this time to store the information, but rather be a searchable portal for users to look for information that is currently presented throughout the Internet.
Although this portal is still under development, it should prove to be a useful resource for efficiently disseminating critical neuroscience information to support the progress of research developments around the world... as well as help spur the interests and excitement of those on the edges of the professional research world (like the author here at Neuron News!).
Try out the database, discover something exciting, and let us know what you think...
"The Neuroscience Information Framework: A Data and Knowledge Environment for Neuroscience" :: Neuroinformatics Vol. 6, No. 3 September 2008 :: [ READ ]
:::
Written by Matthew T. Dearing | Article Link | What do you think? (0)
|
|
July 21, 2008
:::
Optical Tweezers Guide Neuronal Growth
|
In one of the many proverbial past lives of this author, I worked on research to help advance the technology of optical tweezers. In particular, I worked with my research group at Illinois Wesleyan University in collaboration with the University of Chicago to develop the first holographic optical element that patterned a laser beam into a pre-defined organization of focused spots, each of which successfully trapped microscopic particles. This work on Holographic Optical Traps (HOTs) actually lead to the commercialization of the technology at Arryx, Inc.
The beauty of the creation of optical traps with focused laser light is that if the correct wavelength is selected, then biological material--in particular, neurons--won't absorb the light, heat up and die. They can, however, still feel the forces resulting from the changing electromagnetic field as the laser beam focuses and defocuses through the cell.
So, neurons are interconnected by complicated networks. There is some sort of structural pattern to this network, albeit the specifics of this structure remain unknown and not well understood. But, if we want to create devices that integrate networked neurons on computer chips, then we might want to be able to have a high degree of control in patterning the cells' positions so they network together such that they may communicate in powerful ways, yet also connect effeciently to pre-fabricated electrodes through which a computer might actually record and control their electrical activity.
An optical tweezer as a non-invasive, but fully patternable positioning device is then certainly an intriguing tool that could prove quite useful in the future field of neurotechnology. A research group at St. Andrews University has recently tested a simple line optical tweezer and is currently studying its affects on how it might direct the growth cones of developing neurons.
The fundamental mechanism of how the cells react to the focused laser light is not yet known, but there is an observed interaction. The current observation is that the forces resulting from the focusing and defocusing laser light is providing a torque force on the filopedia--the tiny protrusions that guide the growth cones of a neuron's axon--and direct them to line up with the path of the line optical trap.
Check out this exciting research, and envision how it can someday be quite influential in the capabilities of neurotechnologies. We'll be closing watching the developments here from Neuron News.
"Lasers guide neuron growth" :: optics.org :: July 21, 2008 :: [ READ ]
"Guided neuronal growth using optical line traps" D. J. Carnegie, D. J. Stevenson, M. Mazilu, F. Gunn-Moore, and K. Dholakia, Optics Express Volume 16, Issue 14, pp. 10507-10517 (2008) :: [ READ THE ABSTRACT ], which includes a link to read the full text of the research article.
:::
Written by Matthew T. Dearing | Article Link | What do you think? (0)
|
|
|
|