[COVER PAGE]
 
  NEURON NEWS TOPIC :: Neurophilosophy
Back to the cover page
 
« The Mind's Free Will is more Complicated than the Brain's Free Will | COVER | Build a Brain Workshop in the EU»

Bookmark and Share

May 09, 2009 ::: Brute force engineering may not be the best path to The Singularity

Humanity may undergo an evolutionary phase transition within this century at the very moment our computational creations develop a level of intelligence that surpasses that of the typical human being. This predicted development is referred to as The Singularity. This transitional event might be considered a true evolutionary development for our species because our primary evolutionary advantage over the rest of the natural kingdom--high-level tool-making--is driving our engineering of ever-more powerful robots and computing machines.

However, we do often forge ahead in our technological developments with pure brute force in an attempt to make as much progress as possible in as short a time as possible. Notably, the classic Moore's Law, an idea suggested by the co-founder of Intel, has accurately predicted the advancement of computing power over many decades. This exponential "law" is still expected to continue, and is a key predictive element for the coming Singularity Event.

However, bottlenecks for technical advancements in silicon-chip development that conforms with Moore's Law have been foreseen in the past--and have been overcome. Making transistors ever smaller has been the primary brute-force method of increasing computational power, but there must be an ultimate limit: the scale of a single atom.

So, if silicon chips with transistors still larger than a single atom do not provide enough computing power to bring about The Singularity, what fork in the road of this bottleneck might we diverge onto? The human brain clearly does not have a circuitry that mimics the traditional structure of the computer chip. Even massively parallel computing systems do not come close to replicating the network structure of our brain. And it is the morphological structure of our networked neurons that ultimately gives rise to the emergent computational power of the mind... it's just that we don't yet understand this complex network structure.

A brief commentary on this potential bottleneck in reaching The Singularity with a call to consider alternate approaches was presented recently in a New York Times guest column. How will we finally reach The Singularity? A new technological approach may be necessary; a new philosophical approach may be necessary; a new, more complete understanding of the structure of our own brains will certainly be necessary.

"Computers vs. Brains" :: Guest Column from The Wild Side, The New York Times:: March 31, 2009 :: [ READ ]

::: Written by Matthew T. Dearing | Article Link | What do you think? (3 Comments)



:: YOUR COMMENTS ::

3 Comments

Eventually, an issue that I am overzealous about. I have looked for information of this topic for the last several hours. Your site is greatly valued.

You post most definitely was one of the best parts of my Saturday. I was on Google searching for something totally unrelated when the post caught my attention. I'm glad I took the time to read your post! Feel free to comment on my blog at How To MIG Weld if you get some free time!

i'm almost always jumping on the online world almost all of the night so I tend to read substantially, which isn't usually a good factor as the largest part of the internet resources I see are constructed of worthless crap copied from different sites a zillion times, nonetheless I have to compliment you because this blog is honestly not bad at all and also includes a lot of genuine material, so thanks for breaking the fad of only duplicating other folks' blogs, if you ever wanna have fun with playing a few hands of myspace poker together just shout out - you have my email :)



What do you think? Post your comment...

 
[Copyright Notice]